Wednesday, July 15, 2026

The Reid Hoffman money map: $69.8 million in FEC records, and the one line that doesn't fit

One of the graph's largest individual donors, mapped straight from the itemized federal record — a spine of Democratic House and Senate infrastructure, a $9.5 million cross-labeled outlier, and a fresh 2026 entry.

By the Dialog Tracker desk · sourced from public records

A $69.8 million record

The public FEC record now attributes **$69.8 million** in itemized political contributions to Reid Hoffman — 414 committee-level records across cycles, and the bulk of a **$70.1 million** total once non-FEC reporting is added in. That places him among the largest individual donors in the graph. This is a map of where the itemized record says the money went — each figure a restatement of a filed contribution, nothing added.

The spine: Democratic campaign infrastructure

Most of the giving lands on the institutional plumbing of Democratic campaigns — the party's House and Senate super PACs and allied committees, several of them across multiple cycles:

His single largest itemized line sits alongside this spine: **$10.25M** to Ff PAC in the 2024 cycle.

The line that doesn't fit

One recipient breaks the pattern by name alone. Across two cycles the record shows **$6.14M** (2024) and **$3.35M** (2022) — roughly **$9.49M** — to Republican Accountability PAC. It is the only one of his largest recipients whose name carries a Republican, rather than Democratic, label. In the same window every other seven-figure check on the board went to a Democratic committee.

The newest record: a 2026 entry

The most recent line carries a 2026-cycle date: **$1.5M** to Lone Star Rising PAC. Rounding out the recent map are **$3.3M** (2024) and **$924,500** (2020) to One for All Committee, and **$2M** (2024) to Granite for America.

Reading the map

Every dollar figure above is a restatement of an itemized FEC contribution record, each verified and, where possible, corroborated by a second source before it entered the graph. Taken together they describe a giving pattern concentrated on Democratic House and Senate infrastructure, anchored by one large cross-labeled committee and extended by a fresh 2026 entry — the shape of a single donor's political map exactly as the public record has it.

Read this the right way. An association on the board is a documented, cited connection — not an allegation of wrongdoing, illegality, or coordination beyond what the source states. Figures are drawn from public records and may contain errors or same-name mismatches.
Share this briefXBlueskyThreadsLinkedInReddit

Dialog Tracker · provenance — every claim sourced