David Scott

person · Democrat · case file

David Scott

FEC receipts · 2002–2026 cycles

$14,441,492 raised

Influence graph
Individual 18%
PAC 75%
Other

Where the $14,441,492 raised came from · FEC · 2002–2026 cycle

$14,441,492
Raised
FEC receipts · 2002–2026 cycle
$10,804,816
PAC receipts
FEC committee contributions · 2002–2026 cycles
$1,793,253
Spent supporting them
outside + direct · 97 sources

Verify at FEC.gov ↗

Top individual donors · 15

Largest itemized individual contributions across their FEC campaign committees (Schedule A), aggregated by donor across cycles. Conduits (ActBlue/WinRed) excluded.

Top industries · donor money

  • Other / unclassified$38,400
  • Not employed / self$9,300
  • Real estate$7,250
  • Retired$7,000
  • Securities & investment$4,800
  • Lawyers & law firms$3,850
  • Health professionals$1,000

Classified from donor employer/occupation · heuristic

Top employers · donor money

  • CME GROUP$5,000
  • JDS HOLDINGS LLC$3,300
  • OFFICE OF KAT TAYLOR$3,300
  • BIG ROCK EQUITIES$3,300
  • THE RUSSELL GROUP$3,000
  • LEPRINO FOODS$2,500
  • ARTEMIS ESG, INC.$2,000
  • 755 RESTAURANT CO.$2,000
  • RNDC LLC$1,000
  • LONE ROCK RESOURCES$1,000

Top connections · 97 total

People0
  • None on file
Organizations0
  • None on file

Connections · explore all 97

Every sourced counterparty, one row each (edges to the same party are merged and show the largest documented amount). Search, filter by type or direction, and sort. Money figures are FEC-sourced where marked.

Sort

Cite · embed · data

Embed a verified-only mini-card

<iframe src="https://dialogtracker.com/embed/david-scott" width="540" height="260" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="David Scott — Dialog Tracker"></iframe>

Get new sourced receipts as they land — roughly weekly. Built for reporters and researchers.

Entries here reflect documented financial, professional, or organizational ties drawn from public records — campaign-finance filings, corporate and regulatory disclosures, and reporting. Appearing in this graph is not an allegation of wrongdoing. Every claim shown links to its source. How we source this · Request a correction